| Q. |
I
have a hard time believing that usage rates can be favorable
when comparing with liquids…can you show me a comparison
that makes sense? |
| |
|
| A. |
First of all,
I would ask you to consider a typical 55-gallon drum of a
standard liquid cooling water treatment. Think about how much
active ingredient (i.e. PBTC, HEDP, Polymer, Azole, PMA, etc)
is actually in your drum of treatment…forget about the
caustic or acid you are adding, since these are simply there
to keep certain constituents in solution…how much active,
then? …I would guess around 10%….10% of 500 lbs
is 50 lbs.. About what a case of Solid-Concentrate weighs.
But let’s go further. Let’s consider cooling water
that contains 600 ppm calcium hardness and 400 ppm total alkalinity.
Dosage rate for a Solid-Concentrate would be around 25 ppm
for this application. Dosage rate for a typical liquid product
would be about 175 ppm. Let’s compare costs:
Typical
Scale/Corrosion Inhibitor for Cooling Tower Treatment |
| SOLID |
|
LIQUID |
C20-C
Solid
dosed @ 20 ppm (parts per million) |
therefore |
liquid
formula
dosed @ 175 ppm |
|
USAGE |
|
1
lb of C20-C |
is
equivalent to |
8.75
lbs of liquid
(about 1 gallon) |
|
or |
|
1
case C20-C (44 lbs) |
is
equivalent to |
385
lbs of liquid
(about 44 gallons) |
|
COST |
|
@
$810 / case |
vs. |
@
$2.14 / lb |
|
|
|
$
810 |
vs. |
$
824 |
|
|
|
| *Note.
These prices are considered to be “typical”
prices that a consumer would pay for this particular product |
|
| Q. |
What
about the boiler products? |
| |
|
| A. |
A.
Generally, yes. For instance, our all-in-one treatments are
definitely competitive on a cost use basis. BA1-C is dosed
at 80 ppm vs. a typical liquid all-in-one liquid dosed at
480 ppm. Let’s look at the numbers:
Typical
Scale/Corrosion Inhibitor for Cooling Tower Treatment |
| SOLID |
|
LIQUID |
BA1-C
Solid
Dosed @ 80 ppm(parts per million |
therefore |
liquid
formula
dosed @ 480 ppm |
|
USAGE |
|
1 lb of BA1-C
|
is
equivalent to |
6
lbs of liquid
(about 0.7 gallons) |
|
or |
|
1 case BA1-C |
is
equivalent to |
288
lbs of liquid
(about 32 gallons) |
|
COST |
|
@ $525 / case |
vs. |
@$2.00 / lb |
|
|
|
$ 525 |
vs. |
$ 576 |
|
|
|
| *
prices considered to be “typical” consumer
costs |
The only products that I can
think of that would not be comparable on a usage basis would
be the straight sulfite product, but since sulfite is so inexpensive
anyway, the extra material cost involved with using the Solid-Concentrate
is overshadowed by the ease of handling benefits |
| Q. |
Can
you think of any applications where solids could not be applied
or used? |
| |
|
| A. |
Yes,
in applications such as RO make-up into a boiler…due
to the nature of the low alkalinity, it may be necessary to
supplement the feed with liquid caustic. Another situation
would be where there is an excessive amount of alkalinity
in the make-up water in a boiler operation…adding enough
neutralizing amine might be difficult. In general though,
these problems are easily overcome by good, common sense analyses
of the situation and the point is, if the end result is you
eliminated all the liquids but one, the customer is much better
off than they were before.
|
| Q.
|
What
about micro biocides? |
| |
|
| A. |
A.
We have one registered microbiocide that is applicable for use
in the dissolving unit, DBNPA. The use of it, along with the
bio-penetrant is a great program! If protocol requires the use
of two microbiocides, I would also add an oxidizing biocide
through a feeder or dose another into the system (i.e. water
soluble bags). |
| |
|
|
|