About Us


Q. I have a hard time believing that usage rates can be favorable when comparing with liquids…can you show me a comparison that makes sense?
   
A.

First of all, I would ask you to consider a typical 55-gallon drum of a standard liquid cooling water treatment. Think about how much active ingredient (i.e. PBTC, HEDP, Polymer, Azole, PMA, etc) is actually in your drum of treatment…forget about the caustic or acid you are adding, since these are simply there to keep certain constituents in solution…how much active, then? …I would guess around 10%….10% of 500 lbs is 50 lbs.. About what a case of Solid-Concentrate weighs. But let’s go further. Let’s consider cooling water that contains 600 ppm calcium hardness and 400 ppm total alkalinity. Dosage rate for a Solid-Concentrate would be around 25 ppm for this application. Dosage rate for a typical liquid product would be about 175 ppm. Let’s compare costs:

Typical Scale/Corrosion Inhibitor for Cooling Tower Treatment
SOLID
LIQUID
C20-C Solid
dosed @ 20 ppm (parts per million)
therefore
liquid formula
dosed @ 175 ppm
USAGE
1 lb of C20-C
is equivalent to
8.75 lbs of liquid
(about 1 gallon)
or
1 case C20-C (44 lbs)
is equivalent to
385 lbs of liquid
(about 44 gallons)
COST
@ $810 / case
vs.
@ $2.14 / lb
$ 810
vs.
$ 824
*Note. These prices are considered to be “typical” prices that a consumer would pay for this particular product

Q. What about the boiler products?
   
A.

A. Generally, yes. For instance, our all-in-one treatments are definitely competitive on a cost use basis. BA1-C is dosed at 80 ppm vs. a typical liquid all-in-one liquid dosed at 480 ppm. Let’s look at the numbers:

Typical Scale/Corrosion Inhibitor for Cooling Tower Treatment
SOLID
LIQUID
BA1-C Solid
Dosed @ 80 ppm(parts per million
therefore
liquid formula
dosed @ 480 ppm
USAGE
1 lb of BA1-C
is equivalent to
6 lbs of liquid
(about 0.7 gallons)
or
1 case BA1-C
is equivalent to
288 lbs of liquid
(about 32 gallons)
COST
@ $525 / case
vs.
@$2.00 / lb
$ 525
vs.
$ 576
* prices considered to be “typical” consumer costs

The only products that I can think of that would not be comparable on a usage basis would be the straight sulfite product, but since sulfite is so inexpensive anyway, the extra material cost involved with using the Solid-Concentrate is overshadowed by the ease of handling benefits
Q. Can you think of any applications where solids could not be applied or used?
   
A.

Yes, in applications such as RO make-up into a boiler…due to the nature of the low alkalinity, it may be necessary to supplement the feed with liquid caustic. Another situation would be where there is an excessive amount of alkalinity in the make-up water in a boiler operation…adding enough neutralizing amine might be difficult. In general though, these problems are easily overcome by good, common sense analyses of the situation and the point is, if the end result is you eliminated all the liquids but one, the customer is much better off than they were before.

 

Q. What about micro biocides?
   
A. A. We have one registered microbiocide that is applicable for use in the dissolving unit, DBNPA. The use of it, along with the bio-penetrant is a great program! If protocol requires the use of two microbiocides, I would also add an oxidizing biocide through a feeder or dose another into the system (i.e. water soluble bags).
   
 
United Supply Service, Inc.
Questions or comments? Email Webmaster